Saturday, April 29, 2017

Straw Dogs (1971)

Straw dogs movie poster.jpg  Earlier this year, I watched the remake of this film, which you can find at this link.  I always like to see the original first but it just didn't work out that way because they were on competing lists (the server I got from Rob and Netflix).  Plot-wise, both movies match up pretty well but there are some key differences.

David (Dustin Hoffman) and his wife Amy (Susan George) have moved from the United States to her childhood home in England to get away from the pervasive violence happening at that time.  David is working on a mathematical explanation of stellar phenomena and Amy is bored.  They hire locals to re-roof the garage, one of whom is Amy's former boyfriend (Del Henney).  The locals start a campaign of harassment against David in particular, mostly out of jealousy, becoming more brazen every time he doesn't react.  An accident involving a local mentally disabled man (David Warner) leads to a showdown/siege of David and Amy's home.

Some of the differences I liked, and some I thought were interesting choices.  There wasn't really anything in the movie that I hated, but I wouldn't rush to see it again.

The casting of the original is definitely better than the remake, especially the character of Henry Niles  (played by David Warner) who was changed to Jeremy Niles in the remake (and played by Dominic Purcell).  There is a world of difference between the tall, gangling awkwardness of Warner and the hulking form of Purcell.  Personally, I thought Warner seemed more authentic, especially during the siege when he panics at the thought of being handed over to the mob.

The rape is handled with more ambiguity in the original.  Let me be clear here.  Both are very obviously rape scenes but the Amy character reacts slightly differently in each movie.  2011 Amy (played by Kate Bosworth) shuts down completely after being overpowered by Charlie, the former boyfriend (played by Alexander Skarsgaard), withdrawing into herself to cope with the trauma.  Charlie recognizes it and is ashamed, which factors in later on in the film.  1971 Amy is also overpowered by Charlie (played by Del Henney) but about halfway through, she starts to respond to him.  This could have just been to make it a little easier on herself, to reduce the amount of violence being used, but it also kind of indicates that she might still have feelings for Charlie.

I would like to reiterate that it's still very much rape.  Neither incarnation of Amy ever gave any kind of non-coerced consent.  It's just interesting to me to see how differently the directors handled the same material.

No comments:

Post a Comment